When President Biden declared, off-script, that Vladimir Putin cannot remain in power, many pundits reacted by calling it a gaffe that could be taken as declaring a policy of "regime change" in Russia. Why do so many assume that a political leader's moral condemnation of a regime is a call for war? Why don't they see the other important functions of moral judgment in foreign policy? Join Ben Bayer and Agustina Vergara Cid to explore answers to these questions as they apply to our relationship to Russia and to other areas of American foreign policy.
Among the topics covered:
Mentioned in the discussion are the essay “How Does One Lead a Rational Life in an Irrational Society?” by Ayn Rand, the book What Justice Demands by Elan Journo, the articles “Ayn Rand’s Radical View of the United Nations” and “The Real Reason Why Russia Won’t Be Kicked Out of the UN” by Agustina Vergara Cid, and the New Ideal Live episodes “The Meaning of Russia’s War on Ukraine” and “Nationalism and Russia’s War on Ukraine.”
0:00:00 Introduction
0:00:58 Moral failings in foreign policy
0:06:17 Biden's comment on Putin
0:11:04 Separating morality from policy
0:14:20 Vulnerability to evil
0:19:37 Citizen support for dictators
0:26:54 Ayn Rand on moral judgment
0:29:59 Russia's UN membership
0:36:01 How U.S. could act
0:39:31 Judging Russia: "cancel culture"?
0:45:07 Moral condemnation as persuasion
0:48:41 Russia's powerful military
0:52:05 Moral judgment in government